From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 13 20:34:37 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: performance@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B018016A415
	for <performance@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:34:37 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com)
Received: from web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com
	[68.142.206.127])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8737043D49
	for <performance@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:34:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com)
Received: (qmail 46154 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Oct 2006 20:34:36 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
	h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=zPb5uPF2hnA5LF0PQ9pod0AEbdsMGHszj4NOjw/nZfZqq+IuUqE/Nibk51sUxUZqcqKHwPVK0cl678XgSI42WxMPk2QF8G1vkB1ClAsTqOTOhyZjTQ1zwKiJbLcWCoMVnQ8ILgiN0h1xJC12gnvW2F/vIYcWkM41NnLbCkBbv5c=
	; 
Message-ID: <20061013203436.46152.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.34.182.15] by web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:34:36 PDT
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Danial Thom <danial_thom@yahoo.com>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>,
	"Derrick T. Woolworth" <dwoolworth@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061012222508.GA63618@xor.obsecurity.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: performance@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:34:37 -0000

Yeah, bury your head in the sand as always.  

Its been proven over and over. Robert Watson has
admitted many times that 6.x is not as fast as
4.x uniprocessor, but you guys still continue to
claim otherwise. Clowns following clowns to the
land of nowhere.

Its virtually impossible to build a threaded
kernel that is faster than a non-threaded kernel
for UP operation. You can ask Matt Dillon or
Robert Watson or Terry Lambert or anyone else
that  you think has a brain. Its just plain
stupid to suggest otherwise.


--- Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 05:17:31PM -0500,
> Derrick T. Woolworth wrote:
> > Where are the numbers for this?  Where is the
> proof?  Are you using
> > CARP and PF in the 4.x kernel?  Are you using
> UNIX sockets in 4.x?
> > 
> > The fact that your claims haven't been
> substantiated leads me to
> > believe you're not really trying to solve any
> problems.
> 
> Just ignore this guy, he has an extremely
> narrow focus of what he
> wants to use FreeBSD for, and since FreeBSD
> doesn't meet his standards
> in this single area he claims that the entire
> OS is useless for any
> purposes.
> 
> Kris
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com