From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 4 21:38:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: usb@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8797106564A; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 21:38:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750158FC17; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 21:38:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275) id EB33D73087; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 23:39:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 23:39:59 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <20080704213959.GA1706@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> References: <20080703140719.GA72315@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20080703170700.3b91b8c6@peedub.jennejohn.org> <20080703152551.GA73103@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <200807042333.17859.hselasky@c2i.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200807042333.17859.hselasky@c2i.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: usb@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Gary Jennejohn , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: may I commit this small umodem patch ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:38:16 -0000 On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:33:15PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Thursday 03 July 2008, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:07:00PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 16:07:19 +0200 > > > > > > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > > There was a discussion back in september about adding > > > > support for basic CDC tty devices in umodem.c. > > > > This lets you talk to a number of usb devices built around > > > > microcontrollers (e.g. Atmel), and puts us on par with > > > > Linux and Windows in terms of supporting these devices. > > > > > > > > Because this simply requires the small patch below to the > > > > probe/attach routine, so if there are no objections I plan to add > > > > this to the system (CURRENT then RELENG_7 and RELENG_6) in the next > > > > few days. > > What about flow control? Is flow control required for these devices? the ones I am talking about don't implement any form of flow control. I suppose they would otherwise match the previous check. luigi