From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Apr  6 11:55:40 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA12507
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 11:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from woodlawn.uchicago.edu (root@woodlawn.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.9])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA12502
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 11:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from woodlawn.uchicago.edu (csdayton@localhost.uchicago.edu [127.0.0.1]) by woodlawn.uchicago.edu (8.7.1/8.7.2) with ESMTP id NAA26862; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 13:54:43 -0600 (CST)
Message-Id: <199604061954.NAA26862@woodlawn.uchicago.edu>
To: Stephen Fisher <lithium@cia-g.com>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Compiling BIND 4.9.3pl1 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 06 Apr 1996 12:29:19 MST."
             <Pine.LNX.3.91.960406122823.11017C-100000@gallup.cia-g.com> 
References: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960406122823.11017C-100000@gallup.cia-g.com> 
Reply-To: csdayton@midway.uchicago.edu
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 1996 13:54:42 CST
From: Soren Dayton <csdayton@midway.uchicago.edu>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


Stephen Fisher said:

>As you said to this person, I replaced compat/include/sys/cdefs.h with 
>the one FreeBSD uses and it compiled fine on the first try.  I was 
>concentrating on the BSD/ directory after it failed in the main directory.
>
>That was easy. thanks.

yeah, I (or someone) really ought to put this in ports.  It would be
pretty straightforward to do.  My question before was whether someone
had integrated bind 4.9.3 into libc on current.  As I said on the
newsgroup, it would be quite easy if the NIS stuff was not in the
net library (of course where else would it be :) and how different is
the non-nis code in the net part of libc from net2?  (could a bunch of
very fuzzy context diffs be done to get to the bind 4.9.3 state?)

Soren