From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Nov 21 16: 2:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [207.154.226.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C3737B4CF for ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:02:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id 77B6E2B2B0; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 18:02:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 18:02:36 -0600 From: Bill Fumerola To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Hmm..passwords. Message-ID: <20001121180236.U14080@elvis.mu.org> References: <20001121135541.A14220@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20001121082750.A2922@citusc17.usc.edu> <20001121114933.D27266@stat.Duke.EDU> <20001121085551.A3534@citusc17.usc.edu> <20001121153112.B1910@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001121153112.B1910@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 03:31:12PM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-FEARSOME-20001103 i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 03:31:12PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > Maybe in the future we'll get this level granularity. Or maybe this > should have been folded into PAM (which really feels orphaned in FreeBSD > and very few know the vision for PAM w/in FreeBSD). It would be inappropriate for PAM to care, I don't really see what we need as far as a "vision" for PAM, its in our tree, lots of applications use it, some more should use it. I'm happy :-> -- Bill Fumerola - security yahoo / Yahoo! inc. - fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message