From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Oct 14 12:04:54 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA15290 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 12:04:54 -0700 Received: (from dyson@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA15282 ; Sat, 14 Oct 1995 12:04:52 -0700 From: John Dyson Message-Id: <199510141904.MAA15282@freefall.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Implementation of ext2fs for FreeBSD 2.2? To: pete@dsw.com (Pete Kruckenberg) Date: Sat, 14 Oct 1995 12:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Pete Kruckenberg" at Oct 14, 95 12:49:15 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1072 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I've heard that the ext2fs (of Linux fame) is being added for FreeBSD > 2.2. I remember reading several months ago a post by one of the people > who did ext2fs for Linux, that this time it would be "done right", > especially the filesystem quotas. > > If someone could just take a minute, I'd like to know how ext2fs for > FreeBSD will differ from the Linux implementation, whether there'll be > filesystem quotas, and what other improvements it'll offer over ufs and > ffs. > EXT2FS will initially have the hooks for quotas, but I am not sure that I'll be testing that feature soon. It is slower than UFS mostly because the small block size really exercises the performance of the read/write loop. It'll perform approx the same as it does on Linux, even though it uses our new clustering code. The EXT2FS code is mostly a derivative of the UFS code, but a couple of the files are copylefted :-(. I did not do the *BSD EXT2FS code, but Godmar Back who works on Lites did. THANK YOU GODMAR!!!! I simply ported/adapted it to FreeBSD. John dyson@freebsd.org