From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Jul  3 10: 6:55 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from dt054n86.san.rr.com (dt054n86.san.rr.com [24.30.152.134])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665E514ECE
	for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Jul 1999 10:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from Doug@gorean.org)
Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2])
	by dt054n86.san.rr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA04359;
	Sat, 3 Jul 1999 10:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from Doug@gorean.org)
Message-ID: <377E431F.D04C3BE9@gorean.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 1999 10:06:40 -0700
From: Doug <Doug@gorean.org>
Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@yes.no>
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bpfilter -> bpf patches [LONG]
References: <xzpbtdum593.fsf@des.follo.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> 
> [Bcc:ed to net, committers; please follow up on hackers]
> 
> Attached are patches for renaming 'pseudo-device bpfilter' to
> 'peudo-device bpf', courtesy of glimpse(1) and ed(1). LINT and GENERIC
> build fine with these patches; I haven't tried to run a kernel built
> with them, though. Also, although I caught and corrected a few spacing
> nits caused by chopping off five letters, there may be some I didn't
> catch.
> 
> If no-one objects, I'll commit this to -CURRENT in a few days.

	Forgive me if this is a stupid question, but are there any circumstances
where naming the kernel include file "bpf.h" would conflict with
/usr/include/net/bpf.h? 

	In any case, this is a long overdue, and welcome change. Thank you. :)

Doug


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message