Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:51:17 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pccard hangs in -stable (new problem in pcic.c r1.89.2.6) Message-ID: <200106262151.f5QLpHU10183@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:44:55 BST." <200106262244.aa73609@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> References: <200106262244.aa73609@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200106262244.aa73609@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Ian Dowse writes: : In message <200106262137.f5QLbHU09935@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: : >Except that the registers that exist on the Vadem controllers don't : >exist on any other kinds of bridges. : : Oops - but it was certainly the addition of the 'case PCIC_I82365:' : that caused the new problems. Should the : : else : setb(sp, PCIC_MISC1, PCIC_MISC1_VCC_33); : : just become something like : : else if (sp->controller != PCIC_I82365) : setb(sp, PCIC_MISC1, PCIC_MISC1_VCC_33); : : instead in both cases? I should have been more specific in saying : that I hadn't tested the proposed patch :-) That's likely a better patch. However, the power issues are more complex than -stable codifies. -current attempts to take care of this by using flags for each controller type. The 3.3V power is different for each bridge, so it seems. One for Intel 82365 step d, one for cirrus logic, one for vadem and one for ricoh parts. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106262151.f5QLpHU10183>