Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 04 May 2021 22:37:44 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 250799] www/mitmproxy: update to 6.0.2
Message-ID:  <bug-250799-7788-ZybGYBV9qH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-250799-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-250799-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250799

--- Comment #19 from freebsd@monkeyspunk.net ---
(In reply to p5B2E9A8F from comment #10)
> As this looks like an example of a never ending story, there=20
> should be a general analysis why freebsd has so much trouble
> with Python apps/modules.=20

This is a fundamental developer ease issue.  It's a disease that affects ma=
ny
languages. Dependencies are too easy to add to a project.  They should be h=
ard
so people know what their software actually needs.

The root of the problem is pip, npm, go-get, and their like in combination =
with
the popularity of frameworks.  This combination is the bane of anyone who
maintains operating system packages (ports, yum, apt etc..).=20=20

Disclaimer:  For work I maintain several hundred packages (mostly python) on
top of the base OS all delivered in packages.  I am a sys-admin who can
develop, and that may have jaded my view on the matter.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-250799-7788-ZybGYBV9qH>