From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 5 09:33:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD1216A421 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B3D13C4B9 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2007 09:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I6NiA-0004Gj-VQ for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:33:18 +0200 Received: from nat-88-212-20-61.antik.sk ([88.212.20.61]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:33:18 +0200 Received: from gamato by nat-88-212-20-61.antik.sk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:33:18 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: martinko Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:33:12 +0200 Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <20070630085038.GA1473@roadrunner.q.local> <20070701041050.M552@10.0.0.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: nat-88-212-20-61.antik.sk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070531 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: SCHED_4BSD: More than 1 process running on UP machine? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 09:33:26 -0000 Ivan Voras wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > >> I suspect this is showing processes on the runqueue since top is the >> only thing that is running anyhow. > > Shouldn't the number of processes in RUN state be synchronized with the > "processes running" message in top? > 6.0-R here and I can see more than 1 process in RUN state and it seems to be synced with "? processes: ? running" ... so i believe the observed behaviour is OK. what bothers me more is that sometimes my system is under load yet i cannot figure out via top(1) which process(es) are loading it -- that is to say i see 100% cpu usage yet processes count to much less (and i'm not talking about process that are rapidly created and destroyed). :-\