From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 12 14:41:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C8B16A47C for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F19A43D53 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:41:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 78182 invoked from network); 12 Sep 2006 14:41:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 12 Sep 2006 14:41:08 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 09:41:41 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: <20060912123917.U83151@fledge.watson.org> Message-ID: <20060912093841.O43498@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200609061356.k86DuZ0w016069@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060906091204.B6691@odysseus.silby.com> <20060906143204.GQ40020@FreeBSD.org> <20060906093553.L6691@odysseus.silby.com> <20060906150506.GA7069@rambler-co.ru> <20060911005435.A23530@odysseus.silby.com> <20060911142703.GF27667@FreeBSD.org> <20060912001916.S43498@odysseus.silby.com> <20060912002456.I43498@odysseus.silby.com> <20060912123917.U83151@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Gleb Smirnoff , Ruslan Ermilov , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in_pcb.c tcp_subr.c tcp_timer.c tcp_var.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:41:14 -0000 On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Robert Watson wrote: >> Hm, it's been UMA_ZONE_NOFREE since day one. The reason may or may not be >> relevant after all the work rwatson has done with locking. > > Unless the monitoring model is changed, this remains 100% necessary, or we > may find ourselves performing mutex operations on uninitialized mutexes, > corrupting kernel memory, or exporting other kernel data structures > improperly to user space. > > Robert N M Watson Ah, doh. Ok, I'll go revisit the drawing board. Mike "Silby" Silbersack