From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 2 08:39:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAC516A420; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:39:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09E243DB8; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k128dF43083634; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:39:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k128dFG6083631; Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:39:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:39:15 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob X-X-Sender: mjacob@ns1.feral.com To: Harti Brandt In-Reply-To: <20060202093623.H56261@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Message-ID: <20060202003821.K82118@ns1.feral.com> References: <20060201165326.6E44E7302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20060201180223.O52964@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> <43E0F41C.5020907@samsco.org> <86fyn242w0.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060202002644.M82118@ns1.feral.com> <20060202093623.H56261@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, Matthew Jacob , sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 08:39:43 -0000 > On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > MJ>Is the tinderbox still failing? I haven't seen that mail- maybe I'm not on > MJ>the list it's being sent to? > > You may look into either stable@ or spar64@ Ah. I'm subscribed to neither. Okay- thanks for the headsup that it's still broken. I have a slow 420R making its way thru an updated LINT tree right now.