From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 26 16:08:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A151D16A4CE for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:08:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14107.mail.yahoo.com (web14107.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 737F643D45 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:08:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cguttesen@yahoo.dk) Message-ID: <20041026160849.90719.qmail@web14107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [194.248.174.50] by web14107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:08:49 CEST Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:08:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Claus Guttesen To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <7EDDC9D6-2768-11D9-A6B1-003065ABFD92@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3b7and poor ata performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 16:08:49 -0000 > Certainly, we are in agreement that the main purpose > of RAID-0 is to improve performance. Time to change title in header? Or read up on RAID pros and cons somewhere else? Claus