From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Oct 10 19:35:05 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA25126
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 19:35:05 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from bubble.didi.com (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA25120
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 19:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@bubble.didi.com)
Received: (from asami@localhost)
	by bubble.didi.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) id TAA02621;
	Fri, 10 Oct 1997 19:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 19:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199710110235.TAA02621@bubble.didi.com>
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
CC: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <19971010212645.JR64544@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Subject: Re: Intel MMX programming
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * We basically don't maintain the GNU stuff ourselves.  Did you submit
 * the patches to the gas and gdb maintainers, too?  That stands a way
 * better chance.  (We actually maintain part of the stuff, but only
 * since GNU doesn't support a.out anymore.)

There already exists an MMX patch from FSF.

ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu/binutils-2.8-2.8.1-patch.gz

(I replied to the original PR (3157), and this is in the
audit-trail....)

Satoshi