Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Apr 1997 09:04:00 +0200
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Doing the FreeBSD tightrope walk.
Message-ID:  <19970416090400.TJ11242@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970415155218.23227I-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>; from Jaye Mathisen on Apr 15, 1997 15:54:36 -0700
References:  <Pine.NEB.3.95.970415155218.23227I-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Jaye Mathisen wrote:

> So I build a kernel with -g, and now reboot, and now I panic with:
> 
> panic:  bounce memory out of range.
> 
> WTF is this?

Apart from the bouncebuffer stuff, i hope you didn't actually boot the
full -g kernel, did'ya?  The debugging symbols will eat up a lot of
physical memory, for no good purpose at all.  That's probably what
triggers the bouncebuffer problems.

The normal way is to strip -d the actual boot file after copying it to
/, while keeping the fully bloated kernel file in the compile
directory for the debugger.  The debugging symbols only make sense for
use with gdb, so you either need a coredump, or another machine with
the compile tree to do remote gdb.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970416090400.TJ11242>