From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 3 10:20:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail4.kscable.com (fe4.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0328437B410; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 10:20:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from natedac@kscable.com) Received: from wks-166-131-9.kscable.com ([24.166.131.9]) by mail4.kscable.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Fri, 3 Aug 2001 12:20:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 12:18:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Nate Dannenberg X-X-Sender: To: Terry Lambert Cc: John Baldwin , Subject: Re: PR 25958 In-Reply-To: <3B6A37DC.7F9171BB@mindspring.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Nate Dannenberg wrote: > > I'd be glad to, however I no longer run FreeBSD. I have since switched to > > Linux. > > [ ... ] > > > Not being much of a C programmer > > anymore I can't really say for certain though :) > > Are these two statements related by cause and effect? No :) When I put that patch together (as said in the original PR) most of the help came from others who knew C pretty well. I'd forgotten most of my own C skills long before I ever got my first PC :) (I learned C in college, but never managed to put that skill to any use, at the time all I had was a Commodore 128 as my only computer. On that platform, C wasn't a very viable choice against 6502 assembly :-) -- _________________________ ___ ___ | natedac@kscable.com //ZZ]__ | | C64/C128/SCPU |'/ |Z/ | | What's *YOUR* Hobby!? | \__|_\ | |_________________________\___]___| To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message