Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:39:55 -0800 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev@moneybookers.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: powerd adaptive mode latching Message-ID: <478C00DB.2080008@root.org> In-Reply-To: <478BE637.6090307@moneybookers.com> References: <200801110909.m0B99tlr097501@lurza.secnetix.de> <47873840.7050401@moneybookers.com> <47894263.6010706@root.org> <478965CC.1010609@moneybookers.com> <47896CCA.9020309@root.org> <478BBB9C.9090809@root.org> <478BE637.6090307@moneybookers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stefan Lambrev wrote: > It works :) > > Nate Lawson wrote: >> Nate Lawson wrote: >> Please test the patch. I need at least one "it works" from someone who >> has duplicated cpufreq states to commit it to -current. Be sure to >> first remove any acpi_perf patch that you previously applied. Thanks. >> >> > I applied your patch on clean releng_7_0 from today an it works - here > is the output from sysctl: > > dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 2201/35000 1925/30625 1650/26250 1600/23000 > 1400/20125 1200/16000 1050/14000 900/12000 800/14000 700/12250 600/10500 Thanks for testing. Can you be sure the 2201 Mhz setting works properly. Perhaps you can set dev.cpu.0.freq=2201 then 1600 and be sure it has approximately correct CPU performance. One test I use is: dd if=/dev/zero bs=128k count=N | sha256 where "N" is some number that takes about 10 seconds to complete. -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?478C00DB.2080008>