Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:21:37 -0500 From: "Mezz bsdforums.org" <reigncracks@hotmail.com> To: neuhauser@bellavista.cz Cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: *_DEPENDS, and getting the wrong versions Message-ID: <Sea2-F43kiiZIHd0TlK0000f969@hotmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# kris@obsecurity.org / 2003-04-23 02:52:07 -0700:
>On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 11:08:13AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > # kris@obsecurity.org / 2003-04-22 10:29:35 -0700:
> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 11:51:41AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > > one of the headaches using ports gives me is that it requires too
>much
> > > > attention. Let me explain this. Think a port that can link in
> > > > libmysqlclient.so.1{0,2}, and will function the same with either of
> > > > them. Most ports today will
> > > > > Just use a regexp in the dependency :-)
> > > does not compute. care to give an example?
How about check in the bsd.gnome.mk as an example? It's what I like this
method, it would be nice if we have something like bsd.lib.mk or whatever. I
think, it would be easier to keep the track on bsd.lib.mk instead chase the
over 8,400 ports. But, I don't know if it will cause the problem when
bsd.lib.mk gets large thought.
Cheers,
Mezz
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Sea2-F43kiiZIHd0TlK0000f969>