From owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org Sat Mar 25 06:20:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B671D1C534 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3561F19FD for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 34BD3D1C533; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: java@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345C7D1C532 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A32319FB for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2P6KJb1005166 for ; Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:20:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213088] java/openjdk8: Build fails during configure Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:20:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rezny@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: java@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 06:20:20 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213088 Matthew Rezny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rezny@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Matthew Rezny --- I have recently started seeing the same failure on my 11-STABLE amd64 syste= m. The root cause of the error is not in openjdk8. Numerous ports that use bash during build now fail with "redirection error: cannot duplicate fd: Bad file descriptor". For several ports I was able to simply drop the bash requireme= nt and let /bin/sh be used, but for those that rely on bash syntax, i.e. devel/autogen, I worked around the problem by using zsh instead. zsh is my regular shell and exhibits no problems like bash. I am not aware of any recent change to bash itself. There was a change I ma= de one week ago that may possibly be related. I removed options COMPAT_LINUX32, LINPROCFS, and LINSYSFS from my kernel config and began loading linux_common.ko, linux.ko, linux64.ko, linprocfs.ko, and linsysfs.ko during boot. So, I now have 64bit Linux emulation and there is a change to the way= the 32bit Linux emulation works. I will try reverting the next time I do a kern= el build to see if there is any relation. Unfortunately, it is not possible to load linux64.ko when the kernel is built with options COMPAT_LINUX32, and t= here is no COMPAT_LINUX on amd64, so its either all Linux emu in modules (can't = buld LINPROCFS or LINSSYSFS into kernel without LINUX_COMPAT(32)) or 32bit Linux= emu only. Fortunately, I don't really need 64bit Linux emulation, I only made t= he change because Poudriere began refusing to start amd64 jails without loading linux64.ko, but that requirement has been relaxed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=