From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Oct 16 1: 6:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636EA37B403; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 01:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA10440; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 18:05:56 +1000 Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 18:05:07 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Doug Barton , Matt Dillon , Matthew Jacob , Peter Wemm , , Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/newfs newfs.8 newfs.c In-Reply-To: <4661.1003218509@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: <20011016180406.M7373-100000@delplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <3BCB629A.ACF72517@yahoo-inc.com>, Doug Barton writes: > > > > What do you guys think of the attached patch? If this is such an > >important issue, it should be documented. I for one am glad I saw this > >discussion, because I'm looking at creating a custom file system for > >about 300,000 files that are 400k or smaller. I'm looking to improve > >file I/O performance, so I thought a smaller frag size might get things > >packed in tighter... > > Bad idea. > > If !8:1 b:f ratios doesn't work it should be PR'ed and fixed, not > canonified in a man-page. It would be OK in the FUD section of the man page :-). Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message