From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Jan 18 09:04:34 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA05553 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 09:04:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA05548 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 09:04:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id KAA29178; Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:04:25 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990118095621.04517460@mail.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:01:08 -0700 To: Jacques Vidrine From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Attempt to relicense BSD code under the GPL Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199901181657.KAA83724@spawn.nectar.com> References: <4.1.19990118092136.0465ede0@mail.lariat.org> <4.1.19990118092136.0465ede0@mail.lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Nope, I'm not overreacting. The page states that the code is licensed ONLY under the GPL. What's more, even if only the COMPILATION copyright is licensed under the GPL, that's enough to "infect" the collection as a whole. Authors of FreeBSD kernel code should send e-mail to Mr. Lepreau (lepreau@cs.utah.edu) saying in no uncertain terms that they will not stand for this. The GPL cancer has spread too far already, which is why I *STRONGLY* recommend an anti-GPL provision in the BSD license. --Brett At 10:56 AM 1/18/99 -0600, Jacques Vidrine wrote: >You seem to be overreacting. None of the BSD code has been >relicensed ... the individual source files contain the original >copyright notices, and doc/licensing.tex clearly states the >situation. > >In addition, the project seems to welcome requests for different >licensing of the Univ. of Utah code (contact csl-dist@cs.utah.edu). > >Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org > >On 18 January 1999 at 9:32, Brett Glass wrote: >> According to the Web page at >> >> http://www.cs.utah.edu/projects/flexmach/oskit/index.html >> >> The latest version of the "OSKit", whose STATED goal is to lower >> the barrier to entry to OS R&D, has just been re-released UNDER >> THE GPL. >> >> This is not only absurd (because the GPL *is* a barrier to OS >> R&D) but also illegal, because it conflicts with the licensing >> provisions of the BSD code which has been incorporated into the >> package. >> >> Those who are concerned about the attempted use of the GPL >> (which is anti-business, anti-innovation, and sometimes referred >> to as a "viral" or "cult" license) on BSD code should contact Jay >> Lepreau at lepreau@cs.utah.edu. Kernel authors in particular should >> be outraged at the unauthorized and unwarranted GPLing of their code >> and should protested what is, essentially, hijacking of their work. >> >> I'm copying this to hackers, but please address responses to chat. >> >> --Brett Glass >> >> P.S. -- Perhaps it is time to add a clause to the BSD license used >> in FreeBSD specifically prohibiting relicensing of that code, or >> derivative works, under the GPL. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message