From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 6 10:35:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596DF16A420; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:35:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D035143D45; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:35:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CBF2081; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:35:00 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCDA2080; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:34:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 95DC233C43; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:34:59 +0100 (CET) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Ollivier Robert References: <20060304141957.14716.qmail@web32705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060304152433.W61086@fledge.watson.org> <200603051930.25957.peter@wemm.org> <863bhwvtrh.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060306101831.GA21025@tara.freenix.org> Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:34:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20060306101831.GA21025@tara.freenix.org> (Ollivier Robert's message of "Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:18:31 +0100") Message-ID: <864q2b2758.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: tobez@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:35:05 -0000 Ollivier Robert writes: > According to Dag-Erling Smrgrav: > > svk is not an alternative to svn, it's an svn client. > As far as I understand svk, it is more than "just a svn client". It uses > some of the svn layers (file system, remote access for example) but add > layers of its own for the distributed/decentralised concept. The "master repo" still has to run plain svn, because svk does not support remote access; this also means that you can't mirror a mirror. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no