From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Nov 23 02:18:22 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA18634
          for questions-outgoing; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 02:18:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA18628
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 02:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id CAA01025; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 02:16:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611231016.CAA01025@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: Benjamin Lewis <blewis@vet.purdue.edu>
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ftp.freebsd.org & SLiRP 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 23 Nov 1996 01:47:28 PST."
             <199611230947.BAA00908@root.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 02:16:29 -0800
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>  NcFTP 1.9.5 (October 29, 1995) by Mike Gleason, NCEMRSoft.
>>  wcarchive.cdrom.com:/.16/FreeBSD/distfiles
>>  ncftp>ls
>>  Illegal PORT range rejected.
>>  wcarchive.cdrom.com:/.16/FreeBSD/distfiles
...
>   We're not running the stock "wu-ftpd" on wcarchive. As for what changed, I
>disabled the ability to establish data port connections to privileged ports
>(ports < 1024). I guess my question is: why is slirp trying to do that?

   Oops, I just looked and found that I made my checks a bit too severe. I've
backed out those changes for now; it should work again now.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project