From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 30 13:04:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA04736 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 30 May 1997 13:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nic.7da.nl (psd@nic.7da.nl [195.108.246.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA04683 for ; Fri, 30 May 1997 13:03:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dolphin.psd (root@dial.7da.nl [195.108.246.106]) by nic.7da.nl (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA23556; Fri, 30 May 1997 22:03:47 +0200 Received: from localhost (psd@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.psd (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA00258; Fri, 30 May 1997 18:10:41 +0200 Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 18:10:41 +0200 (MET DST) From: Paul X-Sender: psd@dolphin.psd Reply-To: Paul To: Nathan Schuler cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: atapi In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19970530004324.006d3108@sparrow.sanasys.com> Message-ID: Organization: Me and organized? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 29 May 1997, Nathan Schuler wrote: >>Linux did the best, is that true? (there's a list below, I couldn't find >>FreeBSD in it, but BSDI?!) > >Not sure. But as for file system performance, nothing beats the BSD UNIX's. And also not the FreeBSD UNIX's? :-) Is that based on the same? >This list was most likely setup for corporate users. I use BSDI 3.0 and >BSDI 2.1 in my office. Erhm... That's the official BSD distrib or? What are the main differences with FreeBSD? >>OS put to /dev/null get to /dev/null Webstone throughput >>without Router 870 kbyte/s 910 kbyte/s 6.97 Mbit/s >>SCO OpenServer 430 460 3.51 >>BSDI OS 2.1 580 620 4.76 >>Linux 2.0.18 620 630 4.77 >>NT Server 4.0 580 600 4.85 >>Intranetware 4.11 540 580 4.74 -- Paul Dekkers (psd@worldaccess.nl or psd@dds.nl) N.E.V - Nescio Ergo Valeo Pentiums melt in your PC, not in your hand