Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 13:08:21 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: gettext update going in [ALL CLEAR] Message-ID: <1061831301.710.16.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <3F4A40D3.2000000@ciam.ru> References: <3F4A40D3.2000000@ciam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-jkcU8tNwXpHVvkscmxsX Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 13:01, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 05:06, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > >> I am about to update the gettext port to 0.12.1. This will involve > >> bumping the libintl.so version of 175 ports. Please hold off on commi= ts > >> until you see the "all-clear" email from me. Thanks. > >=20 > > Gettext 0.12.1 has been committed. It is _recommended_ people install > > sysutils/portupgrade then do: >=20 > What's wrong with old gettext? Why we need upgrade it? Something serious? It's not necessarily a serious upgrade, but the new gettext offers new language functionality, new translation functionality, and is starting to be used by developers when building applications. I have noticed one instance where it converted a .po file that 0.11.5 would not. Plus, some obligatory bungs (namely some core dumps) have been fixed. Joe >=20 > ---- > Sem. >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-jkcU8tNwXpHVvkscmxsX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/SkKFb2iPiv4Uz4cRAscWAJ9FU5wRVhinOcw28qWkgV5o6jBPqACglg1/ r95wjoaW4Y3uM9CzbhpZZMI= =hvwT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-jkcU8tNwXpHVvkscmxsX--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1061831301.710.16.camel>