Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:17:06 +0000 From: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, joseph.koshy@gmail.com, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposed elf header changes which affect PPC and ARM Message-ID: <20061004201706.GB82080@what-creek.com> In-Reply-To: <20061004.105441.1649768370.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20061004035533.GA76969@what-creek.com> <84dead720610040844o5dc873bt7185e164b20d699@mail.gmail.com> <20061004.105441.1649768370.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:54:41AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > What's the advantage of moving all the machine specific defines as > well? So that one arch can host the DTrace client for another target arch. DTrace needs to understand the relocations, so it needs access to the defines for all arches, even though they are machine specific. -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061004201706.GB82080>