Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:17:06 +0000
From:      John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, joseph.koshy@gmail.com, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Proposed elf header changes which affect PPC and ARM
Message-ID:  <20061004201706.GB82080@what-creek.com>
In-Reply-To: <20061004.105441.1649768370.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20061004035533.GA76969@what-creek.com> <84dead720610040844o5dc873bt7185e164b20d699@mail.gmail.com> <20061004.105441.1649768370.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 10:54:41AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> What's the advantage of moving all the machine specific defines as
> well?

So that one arch can host the DTrace client for another target
arch. DTrace needs to understand the relocations, so it needs
access to the defines for all arches, even though they are machine
specific.

--
John Birrell



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061004201706.GB82080>