From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec  9 18:43:50 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4428106566B;
	Wed,  9 Dec 2009 18:43:50 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from infofarmer@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from heka.cenkes.org (heka.cenkes.org [IPv6:2002:d056:e3f1::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93638FC1D;
	Wed,  9 Dec 2009 18:43:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from amilo.cenkes.org (ppp91-77-255-129.pppoe.mtu-net.ru
	[91.77.255.129]) (Authenticated sender: sat)
	by heka.cenkes.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D8CD2EF16;
	Wed,  9 Dec 2009 20:57:19 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:43:45 +0300
From: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@freebsd.org>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20091209184345.GR98273@pollux.cenkes.org>
References: <20091208060339.GK98273@pollux.cenkes.org>
	<20091208134913.GL98273@pollux.cenkes.org>
	<20091209103248.GP98273@pollux.cenkes.org>
	<200912091002.55490.jhb@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200912091002.55490.jhb@freebsd.org>
X-OS: FreeBSD 8.0-BETA1 amd64
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libi386/biosacpi.c - bad RSDP checksum search
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:43:51 -0000

On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 10:02:55AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> We can probably just drop the message altogether I think.  The
> ACPI stuff the loader does is just advisory.  The kernel will
> give more detailed notes about a bad checksum if needed.

Agreed, looks like a leftover debug message. Can you commit if
there's no objection?