From owner-cvs-all Fri Aug 28 22:12:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA11317 for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 22:12:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from burka.rdy.com (burka.rdy.com [205.149.163.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA11311 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 22:12:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dima@burka.rdy.com) Received: (from dima@localhost) by burka.rdy.com (8.8.8/RDY&DVV) id WAA20198; Fri, 28 Aug 1998 22:11:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199808290511.WAA20198@burka.rdy.com> Subject: Re: make.conf In-Reply-To: <199808282141.VAA00419@word.smith.net.au> from Mike Smith at "Aug 28, 1998 9:40:59 pm" To: mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 22:11:39 -0700 (PDT) Cc: dillon@backplane.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, mike@smith.net.au, committers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Class: Fast Organization: HackerDome Reply-To: dima@best.net From: dima@best.net (Dima Ruban) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL45 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Mike Smith writes: > That would imply a minimum of conflict between an automatically > upgraded /etc/rc.conf and your scheme; because you leave /etc/rc.conf > untouched, the upgrade would simply migrate it to the newer version, > but your overrides would be left untouched. > > The one difficult case would be where a new addition to /etc/rc.conf > was made which enabled a service which you wanted disabled. I don't see a problem here, since rc.conf.local is included at the very end of /etc/rc.conf. Or am I missing something? > -- > \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith > \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au > \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org > \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com > > -- dima