From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu May 26 09:00:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAC3B4BEC8 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listjm@club.fr) Received: from smtp26.services.sfr.fr (smtp26.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7001D37 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from listjm@club.fr) Received: from [192.168.1.51] (22.165.7.84.rev.sfr.net [84.7.165.22]) by msfrf2627.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E43311C000C32 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:54:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.51] (22.165.7.84.rev.sfr.net [84.7.165.22]) (Authenticated sender: juanmolina@sfr.fr) by msfrf2627.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTPA for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:54:12 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: sfr.fr; auth=pass (PLAIN) smtp.auth=juanmolina@sfr.fr Subject: dmesg: can't reuse a leaf (ixl_rx_miss_bufs)! To: FreeBSD-Current From: Juan =?iso-8859-1?b?UmFt824=?= Molina Menor Message-ID: <5746B9B3.9050802@club.fr> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:54:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-sfr-mailing: LEGIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 09:00:51 -0000 Hi! In three different machines running HEAD I have this message in the very first lines of the dmesg output: can't reuse a leaf (ixl_rx_miss_bufs)! I don’t remember seeing it before and I have not configured any ixl device. It seems harmless, but I wonder if it’s a sign of a bug somewhere. Cheers, Juan