Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:26:54 -0500 From: Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.2-RELEASE-p4 Message-ID: <CA%2BQLa9Dckn4vpijFzSx_JgLnZZrJ7WEePBLReDzVwRzz6meLyQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EC6C506.2090206@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <005301cca2b7$add11f20$09735d60$@co.ke> <4EC13877.3070704@bio.umass.edu> <4EC6BC2F.5030907@bio.umass.edu> <4EC6C506.2090206@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > If you compile your own kernel, then freebsd-update will patch the > kernel sources, but leave you to rebuild and reinstall your customized > kernel. > > I don't know about the -p4 update. =A0By rights it should have involved > updating the kernel by one or other of the two methods shown. =A0So far > however, we've seen two reports questioning that[*] and none saying that > the -p4 update did in fact update the kernel. =A0Which is suspicious, but > hardly conclusive. Do you compile your own kernel, or do you have a machine that uses GENERIC? If you do, what is the output of uname -a on it?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BQLa9Dckn4vpijFzSx_JgLnZZrJ7WEePBLReDzVwRzz6meLyQ>