From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 00:56:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B9A0F6F for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.akips.com (mail.akips.com [65.19.130.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D33DA5 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.8.7] (CPE-120-146-191-2.static.qld.bigpond.net.au [120.146.191.2]) by mail.akips.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E3A227F2E for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:49:02 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <54C9837C.8090704@akips.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:49:00 +1000 From: Nick Frampton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-15:02.kmem References: <20150128194011.2175B19F@hub.freebsd.org> <20150128211910.80082283DA18@rock.dv.isc.org> <54C966BF.9000803@rewt.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <54C966BF.9000803@rewt.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on host1.akips.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:56:44 -0000 On 29/01/15 08:46, Joe Holden wrote: > Really, how many SCTP users are there om the wild... maybe one? > > It shouldn't be in GENERIC at the very least! We use Netflow over SCTP in our network monitoring product, so it would be a pain to have to build a custom kernel. Nick -- Founder, CTO www.akips.com