From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Dec 19 17:48:55 1996
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA27495
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 17:48:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mole.mole.org (marmot.mole.org [204.216.57.191])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id RAA27476
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 17:48:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by mole.mole.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) id BAA05422; Fri, 20 Dec 1996 01:48:39 GMT
Received: from meerkat.mole.org(206.197.192.110) by mole.mole.org via smap (V1.3)
	id sma005419; Fri Dec 20 01:48:24 1996
Received: (from mrm@localhost) by meerkat.mole.org (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA13133; Thu, 19 Dec 1996 17:48:20 -0800
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 17:48:20 -0800
From: "M.R.Murphy" <mrm@Mole.ORG>
Message-Id: <199612200148.RAA13133@meerkat.mole.org>
To: questions@freebsd.org, softweyr@xmission.com
Subject: Re: embed
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>
> Writing device drivers for UNIX is certainly no more painful than
> writing device drivers for any other OS.  You at least have a kernel
> debugger in FreeBSD and *rarely* ;^) have to resort to logic analyzers,
> o-scopes, etc.  Don't let the DOS-heads in the world frighten you about
> working inside UNIX; at least you have the source to the system, and to
> other drivers.
>

Debugger not required; kernel printf is enough :-)

--
Mike Murphy  mrm@Mole.ORG  +1 619 598 5874
Better is the enemy of Good