Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Mar 2024 14:20:42 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 277867] net-p2p/tremotesf: update to 2.6.1
Message-ID:  <bug-277867-7788-KZtQkRavMr@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-277867-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-277867-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D277867

--- Comment #5 from Anton Saietskii <vsasjason@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Robert Clausecker from comment #4)

Regarding the flavors:
For me, it seems more natural to use LTR ascending order in definitions -- =
that
was the reason trying to set not 1st as default. Ports tree doesn't have
problems with that (tested and confirmed), only poudriere has.
- Anyway, this is already set as per agreement -- qt6 is first and default.=
 -

And for TEST_DEPENDS, let me put a bit more context here:
tremotesf can use cpp-httplib<=3D0.15.x (which is explicitly set in
CMakeLists.txt), so it's possible to set
TEST_DEPENDS=3Dcpp-httplib<=3D0.15:www/cpp-httplib (of course, not for 13 w=
here
it's broken).
However, cpp-httplib is in early and very active stage of development, so f=
or
example tomorrow 0.16.x may be pushed to ports, which will break 'make test'
target due to unsatisfied dependency, unless ports have an option "register
dependency, but ignore and de-register if satisfying fails" (didn't hear if
it's possible).
Thus, I came to conclusion it's just simpler and makes more sense to bundle
cpp-httplib 0.14.3, which is one of supported versions and works on 13.x-R,
14.x-R.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-277867-7788-KZtQkRavMr>