Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 12:33:06 +0530 From: A Joseph Koshy <koshy@india.hp.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Known problems with async ufs? Message-ID: <199709240707.AAA12771@palrel1.hp.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 Sep 1997 05:26:32 GMT." <199709240526.WAA02832@usr07.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>> "Terry Lambert" <tlambert@primenet.com> writes > Other ways of making the same ordering guarantees are delayed ordered I read (over a year back) that soft updates were being worked on by Keith Bostic(?). Anyone have any idea of further progress on this? > which doesn't have a serial port), then it's much safer to run async; > of course, you are still screwed if your power supply fails, and you > aren't in the Soft Updates or NVRAM cases. This doesn't offer protection from OS crashes though, so you are still exposed to some degree of risk. Koshy <koshy@india.hp.com> My Personal Opinions Only.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709240707.AAA12771>