From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 21:58:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC0716A401 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thompsa@freebsd.org) Received: from dbmail-mx1.orcon.net.nz (loadbalancer1.orcon.net.nz [219.88.242.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E01343D69 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:58:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thompsa@freebsd.org) Received-SPF: none Received: from heff.fud.org.nz (60-234-149-201.bitstream.orcon.net.nz [60.234.149.201]) by dbmail-mx1.orcon.net.nz (8.13.6/8.13.6/Debian-1) with SMTP id k2SLx0nX012495; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:59:01 +1200 Received: by heff.fud.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B2A811CC37; Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:58:17 +1200 (NZST) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 09:58:17 +1200 From: Andrew Thompson To: Baldur Gislason Message-ID: <20060328215817.GB10096@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <20060328205624.GZ20678@gremlin.foo.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060328205624.GZ20678@gremlin.foo.is> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on dbmail-mx1.orcon.net.nz X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 802.3ad? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:58:26 -0000 On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:56:24PM +0000, Baldur Gislason wrote: > Following an unrelated discussion about "interface grouping" in OpenBSD, > I'd like to know if there are any known or planned implementations of LACP (802.3ad) > interface teaming in FreeBSD? > FreeBSD currently has etherchannel support, but to my knowledge that will only > work for a link to a single switch and not provide the possibility of having layer > 2 resiliance with paths to 2 switches in the same network. > Any thoughts on this? NetBSD has an implementation which would be a good starting place for anyone looking into this. http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/net/agr/ Andrew