From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 1 10:49:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBCA1065673 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 10:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0296A8FC18 for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2012 10:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T7lGu-00040R-LZ for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 12:49:48 +0200 Received: from 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl ([79.139.19.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 12:49:48 +0200 Received: from jb.1234abcd by 79-139-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 01 Sep 2012 12:49:48 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 10:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: <1345697446.84337.11.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <20120831182617.GC2990@albert.catwhisker.org> <50412248.30107@quip.cz> <5041C131.90402@riverwillow.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:15.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/15.0) Subject: Re: 9.1-RC1 installer [was: FreeBSD 9.1-RC1 Available...] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 10:49:55 -0000 John Marshall riverwillow.com.au> writes: > > I've just installed an Intel server from a 9.1-RC1 CD. This was my first > encounter with the new installer. I didn't like the look of what the > Auto option showed me for drive partitioning, so I tried Manual and > found that confusing. > ... Fair enough. But what should it loook like ? How to make it less confusing ? Can you elaborate here or file a PR# with details ? jb