Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:51:06 -0700 From: Chad Perrin <code@apotheon.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: If ports@ list continues to be used as substitute for GNATS, I'm unsubscribing Message-ID: <20131220175106.GB3805@glaze.hydra> In-Reply-To: <7E.1A.08130.15834B25@cdptpa-oedge02> References: <307860.67121.bm@smtp112.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <201312190944.rBJ9isTx024731@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20131219181343.GB47750@glaze.hydra> <7E.1A.08130.15834B25@cdptpa-oedge02>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:30:09PM +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > I think train wreck applies more to sendmail than send-pr. Sendmail > dates back to long-ago pre-Internet days where computer users didn't > send email to other computer users. Now a computer user needs to be > able to send through ISP's SMTP server. I think the fact one needs, by default, to have sendmail set up before one can use send-pr is a problem with send-pr as well. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131220175106.GB3805>