Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 22:43:40 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 263976] editors/libreoffice: Fails to build if LLVM_DEFAULT=90 (default) and LTO=on (non-default) Message-ID: <bug-263976-25061-e3oVFxfJvY@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-263976-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-263976-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D263976 --- Comment #12 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Tomoaki AOKI from comment #9) QUOTE At least, LTO option should imply dependency to proper devel/llvm*. 13 would be a good candidate, but not sure 10 through 12 are OK, too or not. END QUOTE I do consider what editors/libreoffice does odd but I'm not trying to propose changes. I leave that to fluffy@FreeBSD.org (the maintainer) to potentially decide what changes would be appropriate (if any). Hopefully, some of the notes in the comments for this bugzilla submittal would be useful to for making such judgments. As for "previous update of editors/libreoffice": I have no way to analyze or confirm vs. deny many details for that prior overall context and so basically have to ignore it. I'm sticking to evidence I can investigate independently and am otherwise silent. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-263976-25061-e3oVFxfJvY>