From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 08:56:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CA816A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:56:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE26F43D4C for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:56:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@FreeBSD.org) Received-SPF: pass (mp2.macomnet.net: domain of maxim@FreeBSD.org designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=mp2.macomnet.net; client_ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=maxim@FreeBSD.org; Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j148uB6W021909; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:56:13 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from maxim@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:56:11 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Ryan Sommers In-Reply-To: <42030649.7020806@gamersimpact.com> Message-ID: <20050204115544.H20546@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <42030649.7020806@gamersimpact.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Formal (208/050203) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Detect Hard (4/030526) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: SysLog X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Marking - Keywords (2/030321) X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0124], SpamtestISP/Release cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] /etc/defaults/rc.conf -- Static Routing Explanation X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:56:15 -0000 On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, 23:21-0600, Ryan Sommers wrote: > The following patch makes it a little more clear how to use the > static routing tunable in rc.conf. > > If I don't hear from anyone, I'll submit a pr for it. There is a good example in rc.conf(5) already. -- Maxim Konovalov