From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 4 17:19:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CAD1065676 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stevan-tiefert@kabelmail.de) Received: from smtpa1.mediabeam.com (smtpa1.mediabeam.com [194.25.41.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041638FC08 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r300-1 (balancer4.mediabeam.com [194.25.41.40]) by smtpa1.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nB4FFKOZ010183 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:15:20 +0100 Received: from [88.134.130.19] (88-134-130-19-dynip.superkabel.de [88.134.130.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpa.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nB4FFJog010179 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 16:15:19 +0100 From: Stevan Tiefert To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso8859-1" Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:16:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1259939765.15418.3.camel@x1-6-00-0b-6a-2d-e9-9d.search.b.superkabel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Updating gnome X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:19:37 -0000 Hello list, why should I do 'portupgrade -a' to update gnome? Why 'portupgrade -R gnome2' is not right? I think it should be enough to update every port which the meta-port gnome2 is pointing, isn't it? With regards Stevan Tiefert