Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Nov 2012 11:37:29 -0800
From:      Sean Bruno <seanwbruno@gmail.com>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [rfc] bind curthread to target cpu for _CST change notification
Message-ID:  <1353872249.20189.3.camel@powernoodle>
In-Reply-To: <50AE3C66.2050207@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <50AE3C66.2050207@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 16:53 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I would like to propose the following patch which should kill two birds with one
> stone:
> 
> - avoid race in acpi_cpu_cx_cst if more than one notifications occur in a rapid
> succession for the same CPU and end up being concurrently handled by ACPI taskqeue
> threads
> - avoid race acpi_cpu_cx_cst and acpi_cpu_idle where the latter may access
> resources being updated by the former
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Index: sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c
> ===================================================================
> --- sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c	(revision 242854)
> +++ sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c	(working copy)
> @@ -1047,7 +1047,16 @@
>  	return;
> 
>      /* Update the list of Cx states. */
> +    thread_lock(curthread);
> +    sched_bind(curthread, sc->cpu_pcpu->pc_cpuid);
> +    thread_unlock(curthread);
> +    critical_enter();
>      acpi_cpu_cx_cst(sc);
> +    critical_exit();
> +    thread_lock(curthread);
> +    sched_unbind(curthread);
> +    thread_unlock(curthread);
> +
>      acpi_cpu_cx_list(sc);
> 
>      ACPI_SERIAL_BEGIN(cpu);
> 

Ack.  This looks appropriate to me.

Sean




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1353872249.20189.3.camel>