From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 2 03:50:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533F416A4B3 for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 03:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2328543FDD for ; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 03:50:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rehsack@liwing.de) Received: (qmail 43572 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2003 10:50:56 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Oct 2003 10:50:56 -0000 Message-ID: <3F7C030F.8040000@liwing.de> Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:50:55 +0000 From: Jens Rehsack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030928 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Eikemeier References: <4029A580-F42C-11D7-91F1-000A956B6386@FreeBSD.org> <3F7BE7CF.5000002@liwing.de> <3F7C01A6.2080501@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <3F7C01A6.2080501@fillmore-labs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Problems with make package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 10:50:58 -0000 Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Jens Rehsack wrote: > >> Ade Lovett wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, Oct 1, 2003, at 09:02 US/Pacific, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: >>> >>>> This should be PR 56096: >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/56096 >>> >>> >>> That PR doesn't cover all the cases, but is a good start. I'll dig >>> out my patch once my testbox has finished rebuilding world and a few >>> other bits and pieces. >>> >> >> Can you give a rough time frame when your fix could expected? >> I'm waiting to set up a couple of machines and must tell my >> boss when he could expect the result. > > > Unsetting WRKDIRPREFIX as an workaround isn't acceptable? Sorry, but no. I build for different machine types from one nfs-mounted ports-tree. So each machine should have an own WRKDIRPREFIX to avoid conflicts during parallel build or uncleaned port during errors while building. Jens