From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 22:31:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C10E57F5 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 22:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lolo@agneau.org) Received: from bergerie.agneau.org (bergerie.agneau.org [78.193.23.109]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RQxH3j0cz4CMS for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 22:30:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lolo@agneau.org) Received: from chimere.bergerie.agneau.org (chimere.bergerie.agneau.org [10.0.1.13]) by bergerie.agneau.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4827C1E9D87; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 00:30:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=agneau.org; s=obelix; t=1567981851; bh=Wgj3UF+4TapD16oxZDjDofiQbRUqe62U+O4gJ+DBSys=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=J60xLVp+3prnviV6IRAHOkNGxtedtOLJnprTaCZQLRZ7KE3n/EeJJ2dQoTfwrqV6n /KPuoJFjoukgDy5LmLu+/p5DIQa2XSjNLphncN+L4GNKqsxXWsXVo64Kpxd+Rjbdcv Mfij5qBiTz4Qpull8GDN/tf/LHeki1DVzJPQWHW8= From: Laurent Frigault To: Victor Sudakov Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Let's Encrypt Message-ID: <20190908223051.GA27412@chimere.bergerie.agneau.org> References: <20190908145835.GA67269@admin.sibptus.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190908145835.GA67269@admin.sibptus.ru> X-Powered-By: UUCP User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.0 (2018-05-17) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RQxH3j0cz4CMS X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=agneau.org header.s=obelix header.b=J60xLVp+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lolo@agneau.org designates 78.193.23.109 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lolo@agneau.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.59 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[agneau.org:s=obelix]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.193.23.109/32]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[agneau.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[agneau.org:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-0.39)[asn: 12322(-1.97), country: FR(-0.00)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[lfrigault@agneau.org,lolo@agneau.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12322, ipnet:78.192.0.0/11, country:FR]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[lfrigault@agneau.org,lolo@agneau.org]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 23:27:58 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 22:31:01 -0000 X-Original-Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 00:30:51 +0200 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 22:31:01 -0000 On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 09:58:35PM +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Which client is now recommended to work with Let's Encrypt? > > I see numerous clients in the ports tree, some deleted, some renamed... > Which one is good? I've been using security/dehydrated for years. Never had any problem with it. -- Laurent Frigault |