From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 09:39:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6188AE59; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:39:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C44C2978; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id MAA27006; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:39:07 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1VCnpj-000PKi-6K; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:39:07 +0300 Message-ID: <52172D96.8090801@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 12:38:30 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Chisnall Subject: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0__43183.8718745441$1377249444$gmane$org@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0__43183.8718745441$1377249444$gmane$org@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:39:10 -0000 on 23/08/2013 12:16 David Chisnall said the following: > I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code slush that > removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build on platforms where clang > is the system compiler. We definitely don't want to be supporting our > 6-year-old versions of these for the lifetime of the 10.x branch. I have an alternative proposal (to re@ and core@) to set WITHOUT_CLANG_IS_CC in stable/10 or at least releng/10.0. -- Andriy Gapon