From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jul 18 16:36:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA23882 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hod.tera.com (hod.tera.com [207.108.223.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA23876; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from athena.tera.com (athena.tera.com [207.108.223.153]) by hod.tera.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA11514; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:35:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Gary Kline Received: (from kline@localhost) by athena.tera.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA07388; Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199707182335.QAA07388@athena.tera.com> Subject: Re: mw fails even more... In-Reply-To: <199707182311.QAA11705@implode.root.com> from David Greenman at "Jul 18, 97 04:11:35 pm" To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 18 Jul 1997 16:35:45 -0700 (PDT) Cc: chokepnt@prima.ruhr.de, kline@tera.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL23 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to David Greenman: > >David Greenman wrote: > >> > >> > Now I'm even more at a loss re my upgrade to a K5 or K6 > >> > chip. Perhaps someone on the Core team--like you, David-- > >> > can give everybody advice on which CPU's do work flawlessly > >> > with BSD and which have known or suspected woes. > > > >Does the problem ONLY arise with BSD? > > > >> > I'm not referring to occasional defective chips, but to > >> > bad logic design. > > > >Problems from bad logic design usually arise at once. In this case, > >however, the problem arose after a certain period of time (in which I > >never made the world, BTW). This isn't usually due to a design flaw in > >the chip itself. > > You miss-attributed the above - I didn't write it. I think Gary Kline is > the author. > That's correct. Nevertheless, this is a valid question. Does anybody with a K6 chip have dos and gcc to try a large build on? I can't imagine that this defect happens only under Unix. But--- gary kline