From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 26 05:15:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA01035 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 05:15:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kalypso.cybercom.net (kalypso.cybercom.net [209.21.136.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA01027 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 05:15:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rhuff@kalypso.cybercom.net) Received: (from rhuff@localhost) by kalypso.cybercom.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA19877; Tue, 26 Jan 1999 08:15:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 08:15:33 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Huff To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which release is elf based? In-Reply-To: <19990126161019.O66239@freebie.lemis.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <13997.48995.143518.490576@jerusalem.cybercom.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greg Lehey writes: > That depends on your terminology. Let's say: > > 2.2 supports ELF > 3.0 has ELF by default, but an a.out kernel. > 4.0 (and 3.1) have everything ELF, and require the new bootstrap in > order to load the kernel. Will 3.x migrate to a ELF kernel, or is that likely going to wait for 4.0? Robert Huff (who, having finally installed 3.0, wants to move back toward the cutting edge.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message