From owner-freebsd-current Mon Apr 1 3:39:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D0AB37B400 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 03:39:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 200E55346; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 13:39:41 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Joe Marcus Clarke Cc: Kris Kennaway , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM References: <20020325095032.F47578-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1017614739.266.117.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 01 Apr 2002 13:39:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1017614739.266.117.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Joe Marcus Clarke writes: > I think I found why pam_ldap wouldn't work with OpenPAM on -CURRENT. > Attached is my proposed patch to OpenPAM. With this applied, pam_ldap > works like a champ. But of course! Thank you very much, that was a stupid braino. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message