From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Aug 2 10:55:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EE437B400 for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 10:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alicia.nttmcl.com (alicia.nttmcl.com [216.69.69.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8F343E6A for ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 10:55:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jj@alicia.nttmcl.com) Received: (from jj@localhost) by alicia.nttmcl.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g72HtN222290; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 10:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 10:55:23 -0700 From: Shannon -jj Behrens To: Brad Laue , Joe Marcus Clarke , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mark.Andrews@isc.org Subject: Re: glib12 port build failure in -stable (update) Message-ID: <20020802105523.A21391@alicia.nttmcl.com> Mail-Followup-To: Shannon -jj Behrens , Brad Laue , Joe Marcus Clarke , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Mark.Andrews@isc.org References: <3D49F8B6.4050204@brad-x.com> <200208020353.g723rIgs034166@drugs.dv.isc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200208020353.g723rIgs034166@drugs.dv.isc.org>; from Mark.Andrews@isc.org on Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:53:18PM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I hate to go on a rant, but -STABLE broke three times yesterday, too - > > this is -STABLE, why is this happening all of a sudden? I'm supposed to > > be able to put implicit faith in it! > > > > I don't think there should be much room for error in the -STABLE branch; > > too much is riding on it. Four hours of troubleshooting an apache server > > which was down for the count. What is it they say about time being money? > > > > Anyway, enough of me flaming, I'm just a little surprised, is all. > > Please go read the stable archives. This topic has been covered > *many* times. Just to save everyone some time, here is a quote from the handbook: This is still a development branch, however, and this means that at any given time, the sources for FreeBSD-STABLE may or may not be suitable for any particular purpose. It is simply another engineering development track, not a resource for end-users. ... For these reasons, we do not recommend that you blindly track FreeBSD-STABLE, and it is particularly important that you do not update any production servers to FreeBSD-STABLE without first thoroughly testing the code in your development environment. If you do not have the resources to do this then we recommend that you run the most recent release of FreeBSD, and use the binary update mechanism to move from release to release. Best Regards, -jj -- o*s*o*pho*bi*a n. A common fear among embedded systems programmers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message