From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 23 17:21:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62471065673 for ; Wed, 23 May 2012 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com (mail-wg0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C24F8FC16 for ; Wed, 23 May 2012 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so7650516wgb.31 for ; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:21:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=0pZlOLQCn4266dPzoEO6ISHHwvb4k2eqQzTinaAADRQ=; b=GzJcQW3pSysuFCt+odSyzhbbutQhzk5ssYDdCqqwO5iFMN5kGIcYSnM9AJxijPv4u0 N8wHyinbMy27dHuljL4cztvD7F3S1Ydy59aKn3r7mPc4eiSQYA0Z66UBDe7i7cCcGxuD CefKYaF/7FCHZbqmEJC/ZGadz16GLsA7BHMhU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :x-gm-message-state; bh=0pZlOLQCn4266dPzoEO6ISHHwvb4k2eqQzTinaAADRQ=; b=Jgi1+NzuQUONdiU+GEBgknBnRezDC67bfCv260pDL7oR1i4qG14TKHIjv1x6dhRzG6 y3UrIqj1RSC8QfllBsKY+qT4nfc2Q0l5a0LlMTljgn1iOqPqzH6ufTeh9HLtVR9T273s m290S3/ZnNAP7I5xOwNffKeo323BzNhBXTaqYB3tLn4V9TyYVuNGQLPz20Q0Q+EZuJa+ uRCjmKQwbp8nsl8vyIzNDKiM1x77/Ger5cM0P/Xfpo9/WeIgqGja3ROjrDqp8xhgw6fJ +B/5YFusN8r5/l7/qkF4I6I97/K3svsIvru3vYJpjcpfgRs+zdH523PNuGCD+s0K3cvz 4TJA== Received: by 10.180.83.196 with SMTP id s4mr47997781wiy.15.1337793658480; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:20:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.223.85.202 with HTTP; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:20:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201205210632.q4L6WPI9081702@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120521143623.34087c13.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FB9E411.9030500@FreeBSD.org> <20120521070444.GG63744@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> From: Eitan Adler Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 10:20:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: faoAWGlnbdG1JQ1Ae0peeEU_8Sk Message-ID: To: araujo@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkhyGjONgzXjFL+71+hf/PrOEPVl9FIF1wxKjGZA13AQWagph+Unab/L4Ejf8uOh9RwDauA Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , miwi@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Dmitry Sivachenko Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:21:01 -0000 On 21 May 2012 00:09, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > Just to let more clear the reason there is no maintainer approval. > However, if there is some security thing related with the update, I believe > isn't necessary the maintainer approval. portmgr or secteam still needs to approve. -- Eitan Adler Source & Ports committer X11, Bugbusting teams