From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  2 20:50:03 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2824B1065670;
	Sat,  2 Jul 2011 20:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ae@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE01B8FC08;
	Sat,  2 Jul 2011 20:50:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p62Ko2xC057143;
	Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:50:02 GMT (envelope-from ae@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from ae@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p62Ko2KP057139;
	Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:50:02 GMT (envelope-from ae)
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:50:02 GMT
Message-Id: <201107022050.p62Ko2KP057139@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: borjam@sarenet.es, ae@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
From: ae@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
Subject: Re: kern/131558: [ipfw] Inconsistent "via" ipfw behavior
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:50:03 -0000

Synopsis: [ipfw] Inconsistent "via" ipfw behavior

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: ae
State-Changed-When: Sat Jul 2 20:44:50 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why: 
This is documented behaviour. ipfw(8) does not check interface names, because
they may be created dynamically.
"via" rule option does not support list of interfaces. You can use shell
patterns like "via bge*" or or-block sintax "{ via bge0 or via bge1 }".

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131558