From owner-svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Fri Apr 6 18:30:17 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F8EF9CA5C; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 18:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8C596D844; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 18:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (ralph.baldwin.cx [66.234.199.215]) by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D77D110AFAD; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 14:30:14 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Ed Maste Cc: Mark Linimon , Dimitry Andric , Antoine Brodin , svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers , re , svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r331838 - in stable/11: . contrib/compiler-rt/include/sanitizer contrib/compiler-rt/include/xray contrib/compiler-rt/lib/BlocksRuntime contrib/compiler-rt/lib/asan contrib/compiler-rt/l... Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 11:24:53 -0700 Message-ID: <2526702.9M648BMneK@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.1-STABLE; KDE/4.14.30; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <201803311138.w2VBcKHP014025@repo.freebsd.org> <20180331184109.GA23589@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.baldwin.cx); Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:30:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 18:30:17 -0000 On Monday, April 02, 2018 12:27:47 PM Ed Maste wrote: > On 31 March 2018 at 14:41, Mark Linimon wrote: > This is the most important point of this discussion: we do need to > ensure there's good communication and coordination between teams where > dependencies like this exist. I'll take the blame here: Dimitry asked > me about merging the Clang update to stable/11 and I agreed that it > was reasonable to merge sooner rather than later to have as much lead > time as possible before the 11.2 process starts. I also assumed that > outstanding Clang 6 issues in ports were farther along in being > addressed. > > The key lesson from this discussion is that for significant commits > and merges like this one we should make sure to always have sufficient > advance notice. Is this driven by -mretpoline? That is, would we not be as aggressive with pushing for clang 6 in 11.2 if it weren't for that? I kind of feel like we probably wouldn't and would have left it at 5 and let clang 6 be a FreeBSD 12 thing. Was -mretpoline backported to clang 5 (I thought there was some talk of providing patches for clang 5)? -- John Baldwin